🔗 Share this article

I have a few thoughts about the remarks made by the sports network broadcaster a well-known announcer following the Serbian champion's victory over the American player during the US Open quarter-finals. Consider – the athlete represents the United States, Fowler is American – and sports frequently encourage patriotic sentiment. A little bit of letdown was understandable. Instead, Fowler invoked the ongoing drought of US male players at grand slam tournaments: none of them had lifted a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the last one standing in the tournament.

Everyone enjoy a storyline, myself included. But come on. Even if the American had beaten Djokovic for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was waiting in the following match, who Fritz has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And if he’d somehow gotten past that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, against whom Fritz had lost 10 of the last 11 sets. The two young stars had also divided the last seven major titles (and Alcaraz proceeded to thrash a tired Serbian in the subsequent match). Fritz stated in post-match interviews following his defeat that he in fact liked his path, because it offered the opportunity to defeat the three best competitors in the world in succession. Fritz is well justified to aspire to the achievement; an athlete is meant to have faith in themselves. But entering that Djokovic quarter-final what other person sensibly had the lack of US winners in mind?

Coco Gauff’s second serve the sole barrier between her and consistent victories

The American, twenty-eight, is placed number four in the global rankings entering this week’s ATP World Tour Finals and has won his last six matches over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. Presumably he could take that spot for himself in the coming years. But evidently that at present, that is as far as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard sit a chasm of performance metrics away. Fritz’s top-class delivery and concussive strength on both forehand and reverse side are sufficiently adequate to defeat the majority of opponents on the ATP tour. When facing the select few once-in-a-lifetime players, however, he is often helpless. The last several seasons has seen the curious emergence of lanky, towering athletes who can nonetheless move around with the surprising speed and fluidity of smaller men. He is six-foot-five and looks it. His footwork is stiff, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the other player was controlling, and playing a soft shot against him is usually a safe bet. That acts as a quite harsh limitation on his potential.

Fritz has achieved a several dramatic, unexpected improvements throughout his career. Early on of the decade, he was circling the lower end of the world's best thirty. 24 months later, he was approaching the elite ten. Last year, he suddenly surged to fourth place – and held the position. But the next leap, mixing it up with and beating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, the Italian, and even a aging Djokovic, is the highest of all. What could the commentator have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the ongoing drought of US male players winning major titles when he had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply excessive and the respect for the magnitude of the task too little.

The American star made a personal best run to the Wimbledon semi-finals in the summer.

Fritz’s play in that exact last eight match should have been enough of an indication. Djokovic won in four sets, a win that only felt uncertain for brief periods towards the very end, when Fritz had saved a couple match points and had a chance to maintain serve for 5-5. The pair looked evenly matched during the rallies, with the American creating numerous chances to win the opponent's serve. But Djokovic rescued break point after service break opportunity, prolonging the streak to the point of agony. When Fritz eventually did convert a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he promptly played a terrible game to drop serve once more; the Serbian had drawn him into a battle secondary to the main contest and forced him to use excessive energy to prevail. Facing match points in the final game, his primary delivery sailed to heaven. He prolonged the contest two times on his backup delivery, but ultimately double-faulted. It wasn’t a choke, in my opinion, just a consequence of having to hit too many second serves.

The contest was quite compelling proof that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to defeat any version of Djokovic, that was defeated by the Spaniard in the following match and did not particularly seem like he thought he could win. This is perfectly acceptable – the Serbian is the greatest of all time, and may not be at the height of his physical powers now, but has acquired enough knowledge and tactical know-how to make up for a significant portion of the decline. The issue is the individuals who were expecting Fritz to prevail, and pressuring him to do so, when he was yet to accomplished anything that indicated he could.

The American is an asset to the circuit regardless. He’s a patient, thoughtful voice in press conferences, more so than almost everyone on the ATP aside from Daniil Medvedev, prepared to not only express his emotions or the strategy he felt determined a match, but clarify it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the blame for the United States failing to produce a men's grand slam winner since Andy Roddick feels unjust. (Since the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, perhaps they can share that load.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

American legend Group

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Division

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• The German powerhouse
• Ben Shelton (US)
• The Canadian talent

“I would likely think about it forever if I don’t accomplish it,” the American told an interviewer in June of winning a major. I hope he understands that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t achieve that goal, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is in fact highly improbable for everybody else. {