🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to find the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.